Situational Awareness, summarized — and graded
What the essay argues
Leopold Aschenbrenner's 165-page essay is built on extrapolating orders-of-magnitude (OOM) trends. The chain of reasoning: compute keeps scaling, algorithms keep improving, models get "unhobbled" (tools, agents, reasoning) — and those combine to reach AI that can do the work of an AI researcher around 2027. That triggers an intelligence explosion (2027–29) and superintelligence in the 2030s, with national security inevitably taking over via a government "Project."
The key predictions
- AGI by 2027 — AI at the level of an automated AI researcher
- Intelligence explosion 2027–29 — AI automating AI research, compressing a decade into a year
- Superintelligence in the 2030s
- Compute scaling ~0.5 OOM/yr and trillion-dollar capex
- Open source fades; proprietary algorithms form a durable US moat
- A US government AGI project ("The Project") by 2027/28
How the predictions are holding up
| Prediction | Verdict (mid-2026) |
|---|---|
| Outpace college grads on knowledge work | On track |
| Compute scales ~0.5 OOM/yr | On track |
| Trillion-dollar capex | Exceeded |
| Open source fades; moat holds | Wrong |
| AGI by 2027 | Open |
| US govt AGI project by 27/28 | Open |
| Intelligence explosion 2027–29 | Pending |
| Superintelligence, 2030s | Pending |
The essay says 2027. Before the bottom line — what’s your call?
One tap — see which real forecaster you side with, instantly. No sign-up.
The bottom line
The input curves Aschenbrenner bet on — compute, capex, raw capability — have largely held or exceeded expectations. His biggest miss is on diffusion: open source did not fade. The defining claim, AGI by 2027, resolves by January 2028.
The essay outlived the fund built on it.
In July 2026 the Situational Awareness fund lost ~67% in a month and sold most of its stocks to Citadel (per CNBC) — yet not one of the eight graded predictions moved, because none is graded on P&L. The full verdict check → Subscribe and you hear the day a verdict actually flips.
Tell me when a verdict flips →Three of the eight are holding. One is already wrong. Which side is your money on?
One tap scores a basket against the same eight verdicts in the table above — and shows how much of it rides on AGI arriving rather than on the buildout that is already funded.
Instant result, no sign-up. Not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
It's Leopold Aschenbrenner's June 2024 essay arguing AGI is plausible by 2027, followed by an intelligence explosion and superintelligence in the 2030s, driven by compute scaling, algorithmic gains, and 'unhobbling.'
AGI by 2027, an intelligence explosion 2027–29, superintelligence in the 2030s, continued compute scaling, trillion-dollar capex, open source fading, and a US government AGI project.
Partly. Its compute, capex, and capability predictions have largely held; its open-source prediction is wrong; and its defining AGI-2027 claim is still open, resolving by January 2028.
The live scorecard updates as models ship and verdicts change.
View the live scorecard →Be first to know when a verdict flips
One email when one of the eight verdicts changes and the AGI-2027 Thesis Tracker moves — the single auditable score no other tracker has. Not a weekly newsletter; nothing arrives until the score actually moves.
Subscribe free →